NUHMAN.com

Both Spring Boot and Spring Framework are part of the Spring ecosystem, but they serve different purposes and have different strengths. Understanding when to use one over the other is key to maximizing productivity and building robust applications. Let’s dive into the key differences:

1. Purpose

• Spring Framework: A comprehensive, modular framework that provides a wide range of features for Java development like dependency injection, data access, and transaction management. However, it requires extensive manual configuration.
• Spring Boot: A project built on top of the Spring Framework that simplifies development by providing convention over configuration. It reduces the need for boilerplate code, streamlining setup and reducing complexity.

2. Configuration

• Spring Framework: Relies heavily on XML-based or Java-based configuration. You need to manually configure beans, data sources, transactions, and other components.
• Spring Boot: Provides auto-configuration, which automatically configures beans and services based on the dependencies found in the classpath. It drastically simplifies setup and eliminates the need for explicit configuration.

3. Starter Dependencies

• Spring Framework: Does not provide starter dependencies. You have to explicitly include all the required libraries yourself, which can become cumbersome.
• Spring Boot: Offers starter dependencies like spring-boot-starter-web, spring-boot-starter-data-jpa, etc., which bundle commonly used libraries and simplify dependency management.

4. Embedded Server Support

• Spring Framework: Does not come with an embedded server, meaning you need to deploy your application on an external server (e.g., Tomcat, Jetty, WebLogic).
• Spring Boot: Comes with embedded servers (Tomcat, Jetty, Undertow) out-of-the-box. This makes it possible to create standalone applications without needing to rely on an external server.

5. Production-Ready Features

• Spring Framework: Lacks built-in tools for monitoring, health checks, and other production-ready features.
• Spring Boot: Includes Spring Boot Actuator, a set of tools for monitoring, health checks, and metrics out-of-the-box, making it much easier to build production-ready applications.

6. Microservices Support

• Spring Framework: While Spring Framework can be used to build microservices, it requires significant manual setup and configuration.
• Spring Boot: Specifically designed for microservices with minimal configuration. It integrates seamlessly with Spring Cloud to support service discovery, load balancing, circuit breakers, and more.

7. Dependency Injection

• Spring Framework: Provides powerful dependency injection using either XML or Java configuration. You have full control but it’s more cumbersome to set up.
• Spring Boot: Inherits Spring Framework’s dependency injection and simplifies the setup using auto-configuration, making dependency management easier.

8. Initial Setup

• Spring Framework: Requires significant manual effort to create a working application. You need to configure dependencies, set up Spring contexts, and define beans.
• Spring Boot: Offers Spring Initializr, a tool that generates a basic project structure with necessary dependencies, drastically reducing setup time.

9. Development Speed

• Spring Framework: Development can be slower due to manual configuration and explicit setups for different components.
• Spring Boot: Boosts development speed through auto-configuration, embedded servers, and starter dependencies, significantly reducing time to get an application running.

10. Learning Curve

• Spring Framework: Steeper learning curve due to the complexity of its configuration and the need to understand its multiple modules (e.g., Spring MVC, Spring Data, Spring Security).
• Spring Boot: Easier to learn for beginners since it abstracts much of the complexity and reduces the need for extensive configuration.

11. Community Support

• Spring Framework: Established since 2003, it has a large, mature community with a wealth of resources and long-term stability.
• Spring Boot: Released in 2014, but has gained massive popularity quickly. It’s well-documented and backed by strong community support, especially for new projects.

12. Deployment

• Spring Framework: Applications are traditionally packaged as WAR (Web Application Archive) files and deployed to external servers.
• Spring Boot: Applications are typically packaged as JAR (Java Archive) files with an embedded server, enabling standalone deployment and simplified execution (simply java -jar to run the application).

13. Testing

• Spring Framework: Testing requires manual setup for mocks, test environments, and context configurations.
• Spring Boot: Simplifies testing with auto-configured test environments, built-in testing libraries like spring-boot-starter-test, and support for mocking and integration testing.

14. Spring Cloud Integration

• Spring Framework: Integrating with cloud platforms requires additional manual setup and configuration.
• Spring Boot: Seamless integration with Spring Cloud, making it easier to develop cloud-native applications, with features like service discovery, load balancing, and distributed tracing.

15. Focus

• Spring Framework: A general-purpose framework suitable for a wide range of Java applications, from enterprise systems to simple web apps.
• Spring Boot: Optimized for creating standalone applications, particularly microservices, with an emphasis on speed, simplicity, and production readiness.

When to Use Spring Framework:

• When you need full control over your application’s configuration.
• Working on enterprise-level applications where fine-grained configuration and custom setups are essential.
• Integrating with legacy systems that require complex architectures.

When to Use Spring Boot:

• When you want to quickly create standalone applications.
• Building microservices-based architectures with minimal configuration.
• When you need production-ready features (e.g., health checks, metrics) out-of-the-box.
• If you prefer minimal setup and avoiding boilerplate code.

Summary:

• Spring Framework: Provides flexibility and control, perfect for complex, large-scale, and enterprise-grade applications.
• Spring Boot: Focuses on rapid application development, reducing configuration, and supporting microservices, making it perfect for modern application architectures.

Both frameworks have their place, but Spring Boot is often the go-to choice for new projects where simplicity and speed are essential. Spring Framework, on the other hand, remains ideal for more complex, customized enterprise applications where full control over the configuration is required.